4/7/2023 0 Comments Firefox or waterfox for macSince I don't like open source projects that become a nest of competitors, I've decided to return to Firefox for the moment. The Waterfox project continues, but I'm at a loss as to what it's intentions are. As a result, it seems to be every bit as fast as Waterfox once was. I didn't have a chance to look into this until today, but finally I checked and sure enough Firefox is now a 64-bit application. I had noticed that not too long ago, Firefox discontinued 32-bit support for the Mac. I wanted to update everyone on this experiment I had made. When 32-bit operating systems are sufficiently obsolete, the Firefox team will want to do precisely what the Waterfox team has already done. Firefox isn't likely to suffer from this and eventually the code from WaterFox might be merged back into Firefox. WaterFox appears to exist for honest intentions and appears to be a legitimate reason to folk open-source code. Some open-source projects have died because their forked into too many versions - none of which was well-supported. This is a dangerous moment for any open source project because there might not be enough volunteers to support two differ pieces of software that mostly do the same thing. The worst of these result in somebody taking the code from one project and starting a whole new project - not because it is a better idea but because they can't stand the people they were fighting with. However, humans being humans occasionally squabbles occur. Normally the idea is that open source software is developed cooperatively by a community. The problem isn't with the principle so much as one's intentions. Perhaps it is just a random bash of two words that are catchy. I couldn't find any explanation for the name. So if you are a Firefox addict and have the blues because it has gotten so big and slow, give Waterfox a try. It is much faster than Firefox and is easier on your CPU as well. I've been using it for a few hours and it keeps it promise of speed. Bookmarks, plug-ins, even layout was identical to the Firefox I had just used before to download Waterfox. When I launched it, it was just like Firefox. Fortunately the Mozilla community has gone back to the drawing board and created a 64-clean version of Firebox with a design goal of speed: Waterfox: I've been using "Mozilla" products since it was Mosaic! The downside of this is that browsers like Firefox are getting big and slow. While geeks seems to hunger for constant change, many of us get set in our ways and like our software to look and work the same as we've gotten used to. In either case, you can also head to its GitHub page and explore more options to get it installed on your system.Dear WeatherCat addicts of "Mozilla" flavor of web browsing products, Here’s how it looks like: cd waterfox-classic Once there, you can simply run it with a single command. If that doesn’t work, you can utilize the terminal and navigate to the extracted Waterfox folder. You can simply double-click on it to run start up the browser. Next, head on to the extracted folder and look for the “ Waterfox” file. Once downloaded, simply extract the file. So, you will have to download the archived package from its official download page.ĭepending on what edition (Current/Classic) you want – just download the file, which will be. Unlike other popular browsers, you don’t get a package to install. Cross-platform support (Windows, Linux, and macOS).Offers separate editions for legacy extension support and modern WebExtension support.So, I’ll just highlight all the important features of Waterfox in a list here. Of course, technically, you should be able to do a lot of things that Mozilla Firefox supports. So, if you like Firefox, but want to try something different on the same line, this is a Firefox alternative for the job. If you do not need to utilize bootstrap extensions but rely on WebExtensions, Waterfox Current is the one you should go for.Īnd, if you need to set up a browser that needs NPAPI plugins or bootstrap extensions extensively, Waterfox Classic version will be suitable for you.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |